Safety failings result in £63K fine & prison term

Share This Post

Asbestos hbeThe owner of a former Burton upon Trent brewery and the sub-contractor on a project to refurbish it have been prosecuted after a catalogue of asbestos safety failings was uncovered surrounding the unsafe removal of the deadly material.

An investigation by the HSE into the building’s owner and principal contractor on the refurbishment, and a self-employed individual who was acting as site manager, also revealed that workers were living in the building and one had contracted Legionnaire’s disease.

Magistrates heard the HSE received a complaint from a member of the public that asbestos-containing material had been removed from within the building and walled up in the basement which contaminated a large area of the building. A licensed asbestos removal contractor later dealt with a staggering 27 tonnes of the deadly materials.

The HSE issued a Prohibition Notice halting all work as well as a Direction to Leave Undisturbed against the building owners. The HSE was then informed that the workmen had been using the building as overnight accommodation and that one workman had been diagnosed with Legionnaires’ disease.

A site visit undertaken by Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service discovered the following catalogue of failures:

  • no fire safety risk assessment had been carried out
  • inadequate fire alarm and detection systems
  • obstructed escape routes
  • inadequate signage of emergency routes
  • no emergency lighting
  • insufficient evacuation procedures

Three prohibition notices were served against the building owners and two against the individual contractor preventing further use of the building as overnight accommodation and any further construction work.

A further notice was also served against the company preventing further use of the hot water system and showers.

HSE’s inspection also discovered that four large holes had been cut into the first and second floors. The voids on the first floor were not adequately protected to prevent a fall of several metres to the ground below.

The building owner, based in London, pleaded guilty to breaching:

  • Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, for failing to protect those not in their employment;
  • Regulations 9(1) and 41 of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007, for failing to ensure arrangements made for managing the project were suitable and for failing to ensure the provision of fire fighting equipment, fire detection systems and alarms.
  • Regulations 6(1), and 8(1) of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006, for failing to carry out a risk assessment and failing to hold a licence to remove asbestos
  • Regulation 6(3) of the Work at Height Regulations for failing to take measures to prevent a fall and
  • Regulation 7(1) of the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 for failing to prevent or adequately control exposure to legionella.

The company was fined a total of £63,000 and ordered to pay costs of £16,000.

The individual contractor from London, pleaded guilty to breaching two counts of Regulation 13(2) of the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 Regulations for failing to plan, manage and monitor construction work.

He was given a three month prison sentence for each offence, to run concurrently, suspended for 12 months. He was also ordered to carry out 200 hours unpaid community work and pay costs of £3,500.

More To Explore

CHAS Certified

 CHAS (The Contractors Health and Safety Assessment Scheme) is an accreditation awarded to companies that can show their health & safety processes can meet an excellent


Technical Bulletin Issue 4

In the fourth issue of our technical bulletin, we consider the use of secondary disinfection, such as copper silver ionisation and how it can control problematic water systems.